“Are you going to wear your boots? If you’re dressing up, you shouldn't wear your boots.”
“Do you think I don't know that homeless people are dirty?”
“Wow dude. You look scary.”
While doing my research project I found very different and strange views on my work for my sociology class. Some from my family, others from individuals not only in this class, but in my other class as well. Varying views, varying positions, but all alike in one way. The lack of knowledge of these same people on the subject of the homeless.
We all know that homelessness exists. They are on street corners; they stand in the exits from shopping centers with hand made signs scrawling messages. Will work for food, homeless vet, trying to get home and out of gas. They say very little unless approached, and then because of varying degrees of mental or societal deficiencies, you could get a “normal” response to the enquiry or a string of profanity or even nonsense words strung together.
I started this research paper with a decent hypothesis. In my lack of knowledge I tried to set up my hypothesis by ensuring that a response would be had by the populous I was examining. I would dress as a typical transient, and then as an upper scale resident and as both I would scream out “monkey!” in an attempt to use ethno methodological tactics to get a desired response. I was trying to see if people actually didn't see the homeless population, or if indeed we refuse to see them. What I found was both disturbing and fascinating.
I started out in my transient garb and choose San Luis Obispo's farmer's market. Not only are the people packed into the street of Higuera, where the farmers market is held, but it allowed me to be able to get a decent cross section of the populous of San Luis Obispo so as to have a decent data collection point.
As I rubbed a collection of engine grease and tire rubbings and dirt from a flower bed on my face and hands I felt nervous. It wasn't until I had made it to Higuera that I realized I would not be able to scream “monkey” in the street, especially with the police presence, and escape with un-corrupted data. But as these thoughts ran through my head I began to notice people noticing me, and realized that I didn't need to call attention to myself at all. All I needed to do was walk the street, from one end to the other, and collect the data that was occurring around me. Without having to do anything to draw attention to myself I was getting the same reaction, I surmised, that I would have gotten if I had actually been homeless.
While in my transient garb, I quickly realized that the hypothesis I had was naive. Thinking that the homeless community needs to draw attention to itself, or even that anyone would care if they did, was the wrong direction to go. But I didn't realize this until I was in the middle of it. So I began to collect the data, for the pure sake of data collection, and I felt that I could come to some conclusion or statement that would capsulate the data I was collecting.
I was wrong.
Within my data as the transient I realized that its not that people refuse to see the homeless, or even that they don't see the homeless. It was that people noticed everything around them, even when no visual contact is made, and they choose not to acknowledge the presence of a proposed homeless person.
As a transient I was noticed, mostly by young (20-30 year old) women, and then I was shunned. They would look at me, and then look away. The major differences was that when they looked away, the look on their faces was either disgust or pity. And the looks of pity were few and far between. Approximately 10% or less of the women that looked at me, looked away with pity. The other 90% were disgusted.
The other interesting aspect of my transient data was that men were the only ones to acknowledge me. Either with the inevitable machismo head nod, or a slight smile. Not one women smiled when looking at me in my transient garb. And the only two people that started up a conversation with me as a transient were people manning the booths. As I was concentrating on the eye contact of most of the people around me, I failed to notice the booths these individuals worked at.
During my transient data collection I also noticed the lack of contact that people usually encounter in farmers market, at least in this area. It's difficult to walk through this gathering of individuals without the obligatory bump by the other people there. Because of the size of the street, and the mass of people, I’ve never been able to walk through farmers market without being bumped. When I began to collect data as a transient I was not touched once, either by accident or by purposeful jostling. It seemed to me that people's proxemic bubbles somehow grow or become more in-tuned to the passing financial status of the people they are around. When I walked by one woman handing out pamphlets, she didn't even offer me one.
I was lucky, I realized, that I had a home, a beautiful wife, and a beautiful daughter to go to. I had a decent, yet due to the public school system of California inadequate, education. I read at least two to three books a week for recreation and have gleaned quite allot of information from the experiences in my life. Yet none of that, beneath a thin veneer of dirt and grime, was evident to the populous at large, nor were they interested in me as a person. I was merely a filthy vagrant, to be shunned primarily because of my repugnance in dress and dirt.
After my data collection had completed I felt horrible. So in most times of need, or sadness, I resort to feeding my anguish with food. As I waited in Taco Bell, first to order, then to acquire my meal, I was stared at by a man at a booth. He was a patron of the establishment, yet his food went unnoticed because of my presence. He was, by broadcasting through his body language, disgusted by my very presence. He looked at me with such distaste I would have felt abused if not for the fact that I have a solid sense of self, and realizing my own self worth, refused his obvious attempt to intimidate me to leave. After I got home, and had my wife take a picture of me, I took a shower. I washed at least twice over my body, the first to remove the dirt, the second to remove the feeling of filth from the populous of the city I dwell in.
The next week was the week I dressed as a somewhat financially respectable person. I shaved my beard to a more restrained growth, dressed in a button up shirt and a pair of dress slacks, and did the walk yet again. I realized that as soon as I had crossed the 10 feet from one side of the street to the other and was bumped. The individual turned to me, apologized and walked on. In that moment I was amazed that the two things I ended up craving after forty minutes in my transient garb had happened in the first moments that I had entered my data collection area. In fact, before I had even gotten to my car from the class I attended that evening I had been smiled at by an older women (40-50 years of age). While dressed up I was jostled at least once, avoided being jostled another four times, and was smiled at three times, by women.
What amazed me the most, within the confines of my data collection, was that as a transient I was seen and avoided. As a “normal” middle class individual I was acknowledged more by women, yet not as much by either sex. It was as if in being like the rest of the “norms” I was almost invisible. I was accepted within their scope of understanding, primarily because of my wardrobe, yet was unnoticed by most. Whereas within my “transient” garb I was noticed by most of the people, yet I was outside the group or collective of that section of the population because of my clothing or my showering schedule.
I feel incredibly lucky being able to not only attend this class, but also in being able to become involved in this research paper. In doing this paper, and primarily the data collection, I’ve realized that the homeless population is not “invisible” as some reports state, nor are they hiding or even moving out of areas as others state (upi news track/ San Francisco homeless head west/May 23, 2005). The homeless population is within our communities and are actively ignored by non homeless people, not because they aren't there (Planning/ June 2005/ City Life/Harold Henderson), not because we as a nation don't see them. We actively pursue our own ignorance with abandon and an almost pathological need because of fear. That fear, of living pay check to pay check, of renting from a landlord that might not be the most affable individual, or because of our own fears started from an early age within those confines of a possible financially stressed situation. We are the reasons that there is a homeless community. We continue to allow it every time we walk by a person sitting on a street corner with a sign. Homeless people will work for food, they are veterans of foreign wars, they are our sons, and our daughters. They are not an invisible nation. They are a nation ignored, except in hushed whispers of disgust as we walk by them and realize our precarious position within our own lives. We harbor that fear, and release it when we see them huddled together for warmth and shelter. We release it when we refuse to acknowledge them except in pity and disgust. We use them as receptacles for that fear and fill them up with our lack of compassion and our lack of acknowledgment. Within the confines of the homelessness in our nation, as the old adage says, we have nothing to fear but fear itself. And that fear is within ourselves.